htc_vive-hri_-_keitaro_nishimura
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
htc_vive-hri_-_keitaro_nishimura [2017/05/03 20:54] – keitaronishimura | htc_vive-hri_-_keitaro_nishimura [2017/05/13 15:33] (current) – keitaronishimura | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
**Author:** Keitaro Nishimura Email: nishik1@unlv.nevada.edu | **Author:** Keitaro Nishimura Email: nishik1@unlv.nevada.edu | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | **Date:** Last modified on 05/03/17 | + | **Date:** Last modified on 05/13/17 |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Keywords: | **Keywords: | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Papers as of 05/03/17 (pw is std) | Papers as of 05/03/17 (pw is std) | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | {{: | + | {{: |
+ | \\ | ||
+ | {{: | ||
===== Annotated References ===== | ===== Annotated References ===== | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | Keitaro Nishimura liked this paper because it showed that the usage of commercially available hardware was viable, it gave detailed comparisons between the different HRI models they had, it had a large pool of people to get data from. | + | Keitaro Nishimura liked this paper because it showed that the usage of commercially available hardware was viable, it gave detailed comparisons between the different HRI models they had, it had a large pool of people to get data from. I disliked this paper because it didn't focus on how to best implement VR assisted teleoperation, |
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Three things I learned from this paper were: (1) How un-optimized VR HRI stands against traditional methods of teleoperation; | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. [[http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Publisher: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Keywords: HMI, Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Teleoperation | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | APA Citation: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Hosseini, A., & Lienkamp, M. (2016). Enhancing telepresence during the teleoperation of road vehicles using HMD-based mixed reality. 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). doi: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This paper describes the usage of Head Mounted Display (HMD)-based mixed reality teleoperation of vehicles. The authors present simulations and experimentations. From this presentation, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the state-of-the-art, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The paper presents the following theoretical principles: 1) Enhancing teleoperation through mixed reality HMI | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The principles are explained well. For example, Fig. 9 shows the correct application of the principles. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the principles and results, the paper concludes: 1) The usage of the concept HMI significantly improved spatial awareness of the HO while performing precise tasks. And 2) some HO found the HMD increased the perceived workload. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Keitaro Nishimura liked this paper because it showed where the benefits of an immersive HRI lie, How this could be implemented in a seated position, and showed the usage of a mixture of augmented and virtual reality. I disliked the paper because it didn't use a real experiment rather just a simulation to test their HRI. I would have liked to see how the HRI would have behaved in a real world situation. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Three things I learned from this paper were: (1) The usefulness of a mixed reality HRI (2) Where using an immersive HRI benefits the HO; and (3) Where it fails to benefit the HO. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. [[http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Publisher: 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Keywords: HRI, DRC Finals, Bimanual Telemanipulation, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | APA citation | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Rodehutskors, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This paper describes the implementation of commercially available Virtual reality hardware to give the HO environmental awareness during telemanipulation. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The authors present the results from the DRC finals and their own home made task to prove and verity the use of their implementation. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | From this presentation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | From the state-of-the-art, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The paper addresses these challenges by using a human-robot system that gives a HO control of the robot for tasks that require nimble manipulation skills. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The results of this approach are the successful execution of the DRC finals task and their own bimanual task. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The paper presents the following theoretical principles: (1) That an immersive HRI provides the HO with more situational awareness of the robots environment; | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The principles are explained well. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example Tables 1&2 show the various execution times for the DRC finals tasks and their own bimanual task. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the principles and results, the paper concludes: That the usage of an HMD significantly enhanced the environmental awareness of the HO; (2) the usage of bimanual controls allowed the HO to execute complex bimanual tasks quickly and accurately. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Keitaro Nishimura likes this paper because: (1) it showed the real world usage of an HRI and bimanual controls in a simulated disaster relief situation; (2) It proved the feasability of implementing such controls in a communication desegregated environment; | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | I disliked this paper because it didn’t compare the effectiveness of their implementation of an immersive bimanual HRI with a more traditional HRI system to see if there were any measurable improvements over it. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
- | Three things I learned | + | Three things I learned |
htc_vive-hri_-_keitaro_nishimura.1493870068.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/05/03 20:54 by keitaronishimura